This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves...
The Founding Fathers knew a government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. So we have come to a time for choosing.
Public servants say, always with the best of intentions, "What greater service we could render if only we had a little more money and a little more power." But the truth is that outside of its legitimate function, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector.
Yet any time you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we're denounced as being opposed to their humanitarian goals. It seems impossible to legitimately debate their solutions with the assumption that all of us share the desire to help the less fortunate. They tell us we're always "against," never "for" anything...
We need true tax reform that will at least make a start toward restoring for our children the American Dream that wealth is denied to no one, that each individual has the right to fly as high as his strength and ability will take him.... But we cannot have such reform while our tax policy is engineered by people who view the tax as a means of achieving changes in our social structure....
Have we the courage and the will to face up to the immorality and discrimination of the progressive tax, and demand a return to traditional proportionate taxation? . . . Today in our country the tax collector's share is 37 cents of every dollar earned. Freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp.
Are you willing to spend time studying the issues, making yourself aware, and then conveying that information to family and friends? Will you resist the temptation to get a government handout for your community? Realize that the doctor's fight against socialized medicine is your fight. We can't socialize the doctors without socializing the patients. Recognize that government invasion of public power is eventually an assault upon your own business. If some among you fear taking a stand because you are afraid of reprisals from customers, clients, or even government, recognize that you are just feeding the crocodile hoping he'll eat you last.
If all of this seems like a great deal of trouble, think what's at stake. We are faced with the most evil enemy mankind has known in his long climb from the swamp to the stars. There can be no security anywhere in the free world if there is no fiscal and economic stability within the United States. Those who ask us to trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state are architects of a policy of accommodation.
Isn't it interesting? That speech was given more than 40 years ago, but are any of the issues really different then than they are now?
When I read this stuff, sometimes I'm inclined to think, well doesn't it always seem like it is always the most important election ever? Is there ever a time when these decisions and elections aren't the balancing point between falling from absolute good into absolute evil? I've largely ignored issues all my life, and I can't say that I feel like my life would be appreciably different if I did do a little more reading, vote in more elections, or just struck up more political conversations, so why should I bother to change that now?
Those excuses for indifference just don't work for me. The minor compromises we make now in not being informed and caring about what's going on in the world around us now lead us to the major concessions we make later in our ethics and values because we failed to uphold them before it was too late. The grounds for the same-sex marriage initiatives weren't laid in the last couple months, but years ago. There are lots of other examples, but I'm sure nobody read this far. It's important, and if we choose not to care about it now, then we're going to pay for it later.
The more I read Reagan's words and the more I read about him, the more I understand why there is so much reverence for him on the conservative side, on both sides, really.
4 comments:
"The Founding Fathers knew a government can't control the economy without controlling people. "
so true..
and the GOP has made it a mantra of controlling the economy so they can control the people of this nation...
keep wages low..denies economic power
keep personal life choices in politics...diverts attention from the GOP fiscal fiats & failings...
Deny Deny deny..until your hypocrisy cannot help but be seen for what it is..
yes the republicans have done exactly what the founding fathers warned about..
You are so far off-base. Do you not understand anything about how actual conservative economic principles work? The idea is DEregulation. Regulation is what dems are for, and it's led to the crippling of our nation's economy. Raising wages? Have you never read the results of increasing minimum wage? Do you have no idea about the results of unions who have gained in salary negotiations? Do you not know that raising wages actually kills employment for those in most need of developing job skills? Teenagers and the uneducated/undereducated are the first ones that lose their jobs once wages are raised. You do them no favors by regulating wages.
You claim I deny, but you ignore facts. Again, you are a complete idiot.
But please, do as you say you won't and revisit this post, and comment again. Because I know that reading this will burn you up inside.
You are an idiot.
You mean the deregulation under Reagan that led to the bail out of the Savings & Loans in the 80's? Do yo mean the deregulation's under W that coupled with the bogus bankruptcy law changes written by MBNA that led us to have to bail out Wall Street? Regulations are needed, they protect one man from another mans disregard...Your Ayn Rand based sophomoric attempts to justify your position are the very things you deny because the truth is staring you in the face but you refuse to see it...Unions make up less than 15% of the work force..I wish Unions had the power you think they do...A rank & File Union worker does not get near the wages and benefits of the upper management, the Rank & File member does not determine policy, product or profits... yet you blame their $30 an hour and their benefits as the reason for the failure? you are a fool...
Increasing minimum wage if you look at history has benefited more people, What if a Man could get a wage that afforded him an economy where he could support his teenager so he could focus on his education? And you have no concern for the uneducated or the undereducated except as lip service and possibly by volunteering.to make you feel good and look valiant in the eyes of your peers..... . maybe if you actually understood economics and how a society functions you would not ask such silly questions..and make such silly statements.You say we do "them" no favor....yes we do sport, the favor is to guarantee they are not forced to work for a pittance...you certainly have swallowed the right wing agenda hook line and sinker... if you actually studied history you would see the truth... You are a young man, you have yet to live a life that will allow you to see reality as it really is.... Also you have missed the point of Ayns writing, study John Galts oath...check your premise and ask..whose sake are you living for? whose sake are you forcing others to live for? there is no Value for Value in you son, you are a token at best and a fool at worst,
my head did not explode, I actually laughed because it is so simple to deal with you...when you have grown past the capability of a child, you will see the folly of your ways.. until then keep that tantrum alive, you may fool yourself into thinking you are actually in control of your fate....
New John Galt. Why would I ever even bother to respond to your arguments?
So far you have demonstrated that -
1) You are a hypocrite. You chide me for name calling, but you resort to calling me sophomoric, childish, and speaking condescendingly throughout all of your comments.
2) You have no courage. I asked for you to supply me with a real identity instead of just replying to an anonymous blob, but instead you can only give out a pseudonym, which is not any different than just responding under "anon."
3) Your words and actions have no integrity to them. You continue to return to my blog even though you started very clearly early on that it wasn't even worth arguing with me about my claims because I'm so far off base, but yet, you keep returning, so you're obviously threatened and diffident in your own positions because you have this incessant proclivity to keep on returning to debate me under your false identity, criticizing me for things that you also do yourself.
So just to respond to a couple of your points...unions. How is that working out in Chicago right now? Teachers Unions are demanding pay increases of 20% or more, when they already earn more than the national averages, and who are the victims? The families of the children whose teachers are on strike and the students themselves. And even with the highest paid teachers in the nation, how is Chicago performing? In a word, poorly, at least when compared to national averages. Do you not read or study anything? Do you not understand that when you place extrinsic rewards on intrinsically motivated professions that require innovation and creativity, such as teaching, it actually worsens the product? This is actually among the most stable of all findings in the social sciences, but why do I bother? You obviously disregard all facts. But sure, you obviously picked a very pitiable population in unions. In some cases, useful, but for the most part, they are an outdated institution that is only worsening and further bloating deficits all around the country.
And what of minimum wage? This also is one of the clearest and most supported findings in all of the social sciences. The first victims of minimum wage laws are the under-skilled and least experienced, and it is among the most inefficient ways of attempting to help the poor. For a simple treatise that even you can understand, just visit the wiki page on minimum wage.
So far, nothing you say stands up. Congrats. You're the most willfully ignorant reader I've ever had on my blog.
Post a Comment