Showing posts with label Pop Culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pop Culture. Show all posts

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Social Media and Going Viral

I kind of love the latest internet videos that go viral and it escalates and the whole world starts uploading their own versions of the latest craze.

Just two weeks ago it was the Harlem Shake:

And lately it's been this:


Social media is such an interesting thing to me. There are all these ways in which people can connect with each other. A year ago it was just taking pictures on your phone and the ease with which different fads spread like planking. And now with how easy it is to do videos, you have these kinds of things that pop up.

I really kind of love it. At least for the five minutes that it's popular.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Disco Dayz

I have had a number of phases with music. I don't know where it came from because nobody in my family is really an audiophile, but I've just always gotten into different kinds of bands, music, etc.

My junior year of high school Dave and I started hanging out with these two girls and somehow I just got sucked into Disco Saturday nights, then that evolved into my picking up various disco classics.Yvonne Elliman is still at the top of my list for all things disco, but today Donna Summer passed away after her fight with cancer. The cancer won.

She was pretty great in her heyday.




Anyway, that got me thinking of SYTYCD and then I got all kinds of excited about it. You what else? I actually ran into Orem native Ryan Dilello at the gym a few weeks ago. Small world.

Monday, February 13, 2012

How Will I Know?

It's always kind of weird when a huge celebrity dies, especially ones that have kind of fallen by the wayside. The way I got the news, and this is probably true for a lot of people, is through status updates on Facebook or Twitter. Social media really does rule the roost when it comes to breaking news. I don't watch much live television, and I usually get my news through the internet, so it's pretty selective the things I'll hear, except for what comes through social media. It's how I found out about Osama Bin Laden, and it's how I found out about Whitney Houston yesterday.

The reaction that some have to celebrity deaths is interesting. I remember when Michael Jackson died a friend of mine didn't think much of it, even saying something like, "so what? The world is rid of another pedophile, good riddance," kind of thing. Others post tributes to that person and really lament that loss. So why do people mourn the passing of such flawed people?

I think it has mostly to do with the final realization that the person has utterly and completely wasted his or her talent. We do have some level of personal investment in these people because maybe Michael Jackson was the soundtrack to your youth, or Whitney Houston expressed what you couldn't in her cover of I Will Always Love You. There is some level of involvement, personally, that we have with these people, even if they are in every other way so completely distant from us.

So when we see them floundering and struggling through their trials and demons, we look at them often with scorn and disappointment, but the actual passing brings an end to the person who just couldn't ever turn it around, and that should be a sad event. It's not only of a life, but of talent and promise that could have affected many people in lots of good ways, but was left unfulfilled. That is definitely a sad thing to behold.

Anyway, I'm sad for Whitney Houston. Hers is a very tragic story. She has a lot of really great songs, but this one was always one of my favorites. I used to go to an 80s night with a buddy and we always really loved when this one would come on. It's just fun and happy. Here you go:



Thursday, May 5, 2011

Thoughs on the Social Networking Aftermath of the Death of OBL

Weird that it's taken me so long to comment on the killing of Osama Bin Laden, right? Politics and current events used to be the bread and butter of my blog, but I've kind of shifted gears these last several months. I did, however, want to comment a bit on the fall-out of the OBL stuff.

I had several friends make comments, write posts, and put up falsely attributed quotes all in the name of talking down people who were celebrating OBL's death. Let me start by saying that I don't think most people were solely cheering for the death of another human being, and then let me add that pretty much anything anyone does in the form of a mob is not really a good descriptor of anyone's true feelings on a matter. Individuals are smart, mobs are dumb, so while there were plenty of images of people cheering and dancing in the streets, I don't think his death was the only thing they were so excited about.

Let's remember who it was that was killed over the weekend - Osama Bin Laden - the same guy who was the symbol for, and the driving force behind the terrorist movement for many years. This is a guy who would not hesitate for one second to kill you or anyone you care about, all in the name of pushing his brand of religion on you. There are few individuals in the history of the world who are recognized the world over as being "evil," and this guy was unequivocally one of those people. When people were celebrating and everyone who wasn't started chastising them for doing so, they're ignoring the triumph of a small measure of justice, and is it really such a bad thing to celebrate when something truly right actually comes to pass?

No, the war on terror isn't over, but it has taken a very large and unmistakable step forward in alerting evil-doers across the globe that the world's lone superpower will not stand for injustice, even if it takes 10 years to come to pass. And that's a really good thing, and something that should be applauded. While some of the demonstrations of glee may have been in poor taste, the only thing most of these people are really guilty of is getting overly exuberant about something that is long overdue.

Plus, why do you want to be the dirtbag who gets on Facebook and tells everyone that they're dumb for celebrating such an important moment? Do you really want to be that guy? Really?

Also, why is everyone so insistent that anything well-spoken must be attributed to someone famous for it to have any real validity? The rise and fall of the MLK quote was quite comical, but true words are true words, regardless of who said it. If something is said wise and correctly, it's still useful and edifying even if spoken by a fool, is it not?

I put up a status on Facebook earlier this week related to these points and a friend of mine sent me a message asking if the quote was my own, and if he could steal it. That made me laugh.

Just thinking out loud.

Friday, August 14, 2009

Man v. Beast

Michael Vick was recently released from a two year stint in prison for his role in dog fighting operation. At the time, he was playing under the richest NFL contract that would have given him $100 million over the life of contract. Following everything that happened, he ran into trouble with the IRS, was forced to declare bankruptcy, was released by the Falcons from his lucrative contract, and upon his release, it was still questionable as to whether or not the NFL would reinstate him. Even still, many animal rights organizations still protest the move by the Philadelphia Eagles to sign the embattled Vick. The Philadelphia Daily News blasted the move by the Eagles with headlines screaming "Hide Your Dogs" and "What Are They Thinking?" He was a marquee player who is having to start from scratch.

In contrast, Cleveland Browns wide receiver Donte Stallworth pled guilty to a charge of DUI manslaughter earlier this year. While driving drunk he killed a 59 year old pedestrian, a human being with a family and responsibilities to loved ones and to his community. He served 24 days of a 30 day prison sentence, and has been suspended for one season, but will be reinstated after the Super Bowl in 2010, making him eligible for the 2010 season. He is suspended without pay for the upcoming season, but still has a contract with his team and will have a place with the Browns next season.

Although deplorable, Michael Vick's actions remained limited to animals. Donte Stallworth is responsible for the death of a man, a father, husband, who had a job and people to care for, but because we live in a society that has a permissive attitude towards riotous living, even at the cost of the lives of other people, but never animals, he received a far less severe punishment. It just amazes me.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

The Price Of Feminism

I read an article earlier this week by Kathryn Jean Lopez titled What Feminism Wrought over at National Review. Kathryn always has a great take on feminism, family issues, and religion, among other things. In the article she states:
What has happened — and what Rihanna and Chris have to do with Gloria and us — is that by inventing oppression where there is none and remaking woman in man’s image, as the sexual and feminist revolutions have done, we’ve confused everyone. The reaction those kids had was unnatural. It’s natural for us to expect men to protect women, and for women to expect some level of physical protection. But in post-modern America, those natural gender roles have been beaten by academics and political rhetoric and the occasional modern woman being offended by having a door opened for her. The result is confusion.

And perhaps, too, a neo-feminist backlash.

The need for some return to sanity is presented pretty clearly in an article in the April issue of O, the Oprah Magazine. The article details how some women find themselves leaving men in favor of relationships with partners of their own gender.


One recently divorced academic describes what attracted her to a future female lover. “She got up and gave me the better seat, as if she wanted to take care of me. I was struck by that,” she said. “I felt attracted to her energy, her charisma. I was enticed. And she paid the bill. Just the gesture was sexy. She took initiative and was the most take-charge person I’d ever met.”


This article isn’t about closeted homosexuality. It’s not making the case that there is a vast population of women who were born to be with women, who are instead trapped in unfulfilling heterosexual arrangements. No, this article, despite its celebration of unconventional lifestyles, boils down to something much more orthodox: Femininity and masculinity mix well together. And women are taking masculinity where they can get it, even if that’s in the arms of another woman.

The women interviewed in the article appear to want someone to take charge a bit — there is an attraction to, if not a need for, some hierarchy. And in a culture in which masculinity — well, at least in men — is so often suspect, some women seem to be looking to reinvent the masculine themselves.
I always hate the idea of building up one race, gender, culture, etc. at the expense of the other. One of my biggest pet peeves is when I hear in church someone talking about Adam and Eve, and always having to take some kind of shot at males, or the way in which Adam responds to God when God comes to visit them in the Garden of Eden after they had partaken of the fruit. Building up women does not mean we have to tear down men. Goodness knows that we men already do a good enough job of doing that on our own as it is. We do not need everyone pointing out every flaw that belongs to the male gender.

I really like her point about how embedded within each of our gender's are unique identities and characteristics that allow us to seek out one another to make ourselves whole. Just as Paul says, "neither is man without the woman, neither the without the man, in the Lord" (1 Cor 11:11). The idea is that we form complements to one another in the creation of a perfect union that brings us ultimately closer to God. These points are also emphasized and reinforced in the Family Proclamation issued by the church to the world. It says:
All human beings—male and female—are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny. Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose...

Husband and wife have a solemn responsibility to love and care for each other and for their children. "Children are an heritage of the Lord" (Psalms 127:3). Parents have a sacred duty to rear their children in love and righteousness, to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, to teach them to love and serve one another, to observe the commandments of God and to be law-abiding citizens wherever they live. Husbands and wives—mothers and fathers—will be held accountable before God for the discharge of these obligations.

The family is ordained of God. Marriage between man and woman is essential to His eternal plan. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity. Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. Successful marriages and families are established and maintained on principles of faith, prayer, repentance, forgiveness, respect, love, compassion, work, and wholesome recreational activities. By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families. Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners. Disability, death, or other circumstances may necessitate individual adaptation. Extended families should lend support when needed.

Anyway, her main point is a good one - feminism has worked so hard to eliminate any conceivable differences between men and women that there is very little mutual desire to build up the opposite gender. Men should naturally want to build up and support women, and the same is also true for women, but in today's culture it's more competition than cooperation with one another, and this in turn leads more often to contention than affection.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Reading Rainbow

It's been snowing a lot here this week. I think as the cold slows down the movement of the atoms, a similar fate has been dealt to my activity. At least school activity. As the end of the semester gets closer (t-minus one day and counting...), I'm having a harder and harder time getting things done. I know, like I could get any worse on that front, right? Anyway...

One of the things that I decided had to be finished before I got to any of the stuff that I really was supposed to do was finish Breaking Dawn. I actually liked it. There was more movement than in any of the other books. More story to follow. Say what you will about the series, but that Stephanie Meyer spins a good yarn. Things I didn't like (spoilers):
  • Why do the characters have so little faith in their own family? Alice leaves and in less than a day everyone resigns themselves to the fact that she has abandoned them. Maybe Bella wouldn't get it, but how about the rest of the family that she's been around for decades?
  • Kind of anti-climactic to have build up for hundreds of pages, and then no fight at the end, isn't it? That's what is so awesome about J.K. Rowling. She is not j/k about killing off her characters, even the ones that you are most invested in (that just happened). It makes the story more real, and the juxtaposition of the victories with the agonizing deaths really adds depth to that whole world. While the Twilight series is entertaining, there is no comparison with Harry Potter.
I was saddened, at first, when I finished the series because I was afraid it was going to take me a little while to find another book to get engrossed in. And then I started reading Freakonomics and A Christmas Carol and I'm good again. I've never read A Christmas Carol, and I'm keeping the holiday-themed reading thing going. I thought that being so familiar with the story already would make it a little boring, but who knew that Dickens was such a good writer? It's even kind of fun to think about the various portrayals that I've seen over the years of Ebeneezer (Bill Murray, and Scrooge McDuck are the ones featured most heavily in my mind) and compare that to the actual source. So I've got a few books to work on over the break, which I'm pretty excited about.

One last thing about Breaking Dawn. I read the first three in the span of a few weeks in the summer, and then I didn't want to buy the fourth because I knew so many people had it. But without any actual friends in Utah, I didn't know who I could borrow it from. So when I was at home over Thanksgiving I stole Caitlin's copy. Before I started it, I had almost convinced myself that I didn't actually like the series as much as I did over the summer, that it was childish, too femy, etc., but it wasn't long before I got hooked in again. I was even staying up after our late night video game escapades to read the book. In the airport I would take it out of my backpack on the plane and hide the cover because I was embarrassed to admit that I was getting into it again, even if the people around me were total strangers. Maybe just embarrassed to admit it to myself. But the books are good. I can't see how anybody who actually gives it an honest chance doesn't get wrapped up in that little vampire world. Vampires are cool. Period. I've read several books with vampire portrayals, and I like all the versions of them. It's such a funny thing to have the villain so widely admired, romanticized on one end, but then to have such evil, vile foils to counterbalance the Edward portrayals on the other end.

Remember the Muppets? I swiped this from another person's blog that I stalk.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Religulous

I just happened to catch this morning some of last night's Daily Show episode where Jon Stewart was interviewing Bill Maher, and talking about his new movie Religulous.

I enjoy Jon Stewart. I think the Daily Show for the most part is funny, but I hate the politics, and I hate that they so grossly misrepresent consevative viewpoints. It's the same reason I can't listen to NPR. And it's not that I can't listen to an opposing viewpoint, but I hate that it's so often done with so much contempt for the Right.

That's mostly what I felt after watching the interview with Bill Maher. Admittedly, a good amount of what he said was done in a humorous way, but there is so much vitriol behind the things that they say. It's one thing to disagree with the things that I believe in, but it's another to mock those beliefs so vehemently. And I can't say that it's something uncommon, or even new. This is how it always has been, and always will be.

Is it unfair to say that this is the typical view of the liberal left? Probably not. I think also that this is pretty representative of the media in general and how they view religion, and maybe Christianity in particular. This is part of what fuels the fervor behind the hatred for Sarah Palin.

Doesn't mean that it's not annoying though. For what it's worth, here's the trailer:



And here is Bill explaining his film on Larry King:

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Scary Stories

As a child, I was kind of obsessed with ghost stories. I just absolutely loved them. I had all the Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark books, and I read anything else I could get my hands on. I even read them in a darkened room by myself. I think the illustrations throughout those books are almost as bad as the stories themselves.

You know who had compiled one of the best compilations of ghost stories I had ever read? Roald Dahl. That guy is pretty awesome. Orson Scott Card also has a really cool book of short horror stories.

I don't know what happened, but in the years since I haven't bothered reading anything else from the horror genre. Not until recently at least.

I bought Stephen King's book, Everything's Eventual more than a year ago to read the short story 1408. I loved the story, but didn't bother reading anything else from the book.

Well I started up again. And there are some really great ones. I love how the book is billed as a "nighmarish landscape of unrelenting horror and shocking revelations" when of the 6 or 7 stories I've read, only a couple of them would really be classified as being horror. All the other ones are kind of hopeful actually.

I tried finding my favorite one so far, That Feeling You Can Only Say What It Is In French, but I can't find any full text copies anywhere. I don't think of that one as being of the horror genre, but it's still chilling. I just love that one.

King is a really, really great writer. It's easy to write him off as being an author who overproduces a tired product, but he's so prolific because he's got such an incredible and active imagination. And what's more, he has some amazing stories that don't have anything to do with horror - Green Mile, Stand By Me, and Shawshank Redemption, among others. Yup, those are all based on Stephen King stories.

I think I've mentioned his commentary before on the Passion of the Christ, but I've found the full text of the article that can be found here. Keep in mind that that particular piece comes from the master of horror. It's short, and definitely worth reading.

After some consultation, I've settled on my first Stephen King novel being Salem's Lot. I just really wanted something appropriate for the Halloween season that we're about to embark upon. And this is one of his earliest novels, and it's about vampires. I'm loving it.

I've read Bram Stoker's Dracula, and some of the Rice Interview With A Vampire series, and most recently the Twilight books. I'm anticipating, or maybe just hoping, that this will be the best of all the vampire books that I'll ever read. We'll see.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Oh TV, How I've Missed You!

Dear TV,

Man, I have really missed you. I didn't think it would be so hard, and I thought that I could get by with just a steady diet of sports, reality TV shows, and midseason replacements, but I miss you. I ache for my regularly scheduled programs. It really was a big blow when Heroes had to cut its season short, basically in half. I didn't think you would ever do that to me. Especially to such an important part of my normal TV diet, with a show that I've become so enamored with over only its first two seasons. I just didn't see that coming. And you know how much I love comic book movies and related TV shows. How could you think that wouldn't cut me so deeply? That one really hurt.

Then it only got worse from there. And it's not even like I watch all that much TV. All I'm really asking for is one good solid TV night a week and some scattered goodness here and there. Maybe something that I can have recorded on my DVR that I can get to when I have something to eat, just so I wouldn't have to be alone, but you wouldn't even give me that.

Instead you tried to pawn off My Dad Is Better Than Your Dad like I wouldn't even notice. What was that even about??? Did you really think that would satisfy my hunger pains? especially after you got me hooked on Pushing Daisies? Who knew that Kristin Chenoweth would make such a smooth transition from Broadway to Network Television? You did TV, that's who. I'll admit that bringing back American Gladiators was a smooth move. You know how much I love Hulk Hogan - and I am a real American.



What hurt me the most, however, was that you took away from me my entire Thursday night lineup. You know that I look forward to my TV-palooza nights as much as anything else. I'm not talking about Grey's Anatomy. I may be a borderline 'mo, but at least I'm a somewhat masculine one (most of the time). I'm talking about my fully nourishing diet of My Name Is Earl, The Office, Scrubs, and 30 Rock. Somehow you packed the perfect programming punch those blessed nights. I got all of my RDA of TV from that night alone. I need my nutriets, baby! I need you.

Last night while playing soccer I wasn't having the greatest time. Sure, it was fun to run around and play. I'll always enjoy it, but something felt off. I played on Dave's team most of the night and he was dribbling the ball upfield, passed it off, and then yelled for the guy to "pull it harder!" And with an alertness that I could not at all anticipate, he That's-What-She-Said his own statement in the middle of the game. I couldn't believe my freakin' ears. Who has that kind of presence of mind? I was completely incapacitated; I just couldn't stop laughing. And then I remembered that we have Michael Scott to thank for that line of humor. Sure it was popular before, but that show made that line so mainstream. That's what you do for us TV. Even when you've left me you still have a lasting effect on me. I wish I could have quit you.

But tonight you're coming back with a full hour of My Name Is Earl. No, this season hasn't been as entertaing as last season, but I'll take anything right now. And next week you're giving me back my Office. I wish I had more pride and could say no to you, but I can't. I don't know how you're going to salvage this final season of Scrubs for me, but I don't care anymore. I need you. I need your TV energy to ignite the chlorophyll within me so I can live. I don't think I can survive without you stimulating the photosynthesis within my heart.

I don't care what happened in the last six months anymore. Yes, you cut me to the bone. But let's just start over. Just you and me, tonight curled up together like two spoons, so close that no one else can tell where you stop and I begin. Let's try this again. We'll make it work.

Your Helpless Love Slave,

Chris

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Ben Affleck, huh?

This is not a church appropriate video by any means. And I hesitate to post this video, especially since my branch president has now been perusing my blog, but I just loved all the celebrity cameos. My favorite is probably Josh Groban, but the celebrity chorus is pretty dang awesome. I heard Jimmy on KROQ this morning and they were talking about Harrison Ford doing a cameo on the video and they gave him a choice between doing one short scene and having to stay from 11-1, or doing more work and being there from 11-5, and he opted for the longer one. It's funny that all these celebs will do these videos, but then won't actually appear on his show as a guest.

Anybody want to go catch a show of his? I did one a couple of years ago with Dave and Kristen, and it was a lot of fun. It's free, and feels like it lasts for about 5 minutes, because the whole thing is live so it really only lasts an hour. Karen, when you come down in June we should go to a taping...anyway, here it is:


Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Britney - A Picture Story

Remember when there was a time when Britney Spears used to drive you Crazy?




And not that kind of crazy?










Sometimes...


I remember back in college we used to have a cardboard cutout of her when she was in her hey day. We would hide it around our apartment, and at night if you were walking around in the dark you might get a rude awakening a la Britney if you weren't careful. It was the only way we could get her into our apartment, because unless you were this guy...




she was just way out of your league. Then, Oops...











Boys...










She did it...








again...




















Now it seems like she's probably wishing she could do so well as hook-up with the likes of a Kevin Federline.








I used to think...if only I could be so Lucky...
















I would have been her Slave...










During freshman year at school me, Dave, Laura, and Brenna went through a two month phase where, baby, we just wanted one more time out on the scene...







Now I wish I didn't have to see her fall from grace.









I wish she were Stronger...









And Toxic...




But not like that...











I wish I could say that I want her to Gimme More...







but even then it doesn't seem like she will ever recover.















Well it's My Prerogative to preserve the memory that Britney we all used to know and love.

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Wishing You A Belated Merry Saturnalia!

Before it gets to be too far gone to bring this up, I wanted to link to some interesting articles on Christmas. This one is from my favorite columnist at NRO, Jay Nordlinger, talking about the assault on Christmas. This article comes from the Wall Street Journal detailing a brief history of the holiday - this is a really great read. And then this article from a Catholic perspective, gives a great explanation of the holiday but grounded in Christianity. Finally, there is this piece that I found on National Review Online (NRO - I don't know if I've ever clarified that abbreviation before).

Professor Wilhelmsen makes an interesting point in his theological discourse regarding the usurpation of the pagan holiday for the purposes of tranposing Christianity:




A solar cult of the Mithraic religion competed with Christianity for dominance within the Empire. Set up to climax the older Saturnalia which lasted from December 17 to December 24, the feast of the Sun climaxed a period of merrymaking when all classes of society mingled together in a carnival spirit of gift exchanging, the carrying of torches, and the wearing of colorful and outlandish costumes. In grafting the spirit of that pagan celebration onto Christmas, the early Fathers transmuted heathen revelry into Christian joy.


The last link is one that I thoroughly enjoyed. I try and avoid doing this, but I'm going to quote at length from the article. I'd really like you all to be able to partake in this because it will lead quite well to my last point. Anyway, you might think that the excerpts I include from articles are too lengthy as it is, but trust me...I do pare it down a lot from what I would initially like to include:


It’s easy for anyone with one part brain and two parts wit to puncture an incandescent bubble of faith. Sometimes, everyday life does the same. It was on a Delta jet somewhere above North Carolina that I first doubted everything I’d learned in catechism. Peering through clouds, those swirling puffs of fog that our ancestors thought concealed Heaven; looking down at the specks of cars and homes and skyscrapers writ small, one grasps with alarming clarity the idea of personal insignificance. In the clouds, a vision of a personal God retreats as quickly as the oxygen supply.

But then, you land. And it isn’t long before God creeps back in. Faith cracks, it mends, it matures. It takes in new information and adjusts. Like a GPS navigator, it recalculates constantly, sometimes a little too often, sometimes not often enough.

Or, is it just that damned temporal lobe acting up again? Perhaps. Or maybe it’s not my circuit board that’s misfiring, but Hitchens’s; there appear to be more of my kind than his. Usually, normalcy is something to be desired; not in the skeptic’s world.

But for those of us who don’t need a God Helmet, who intuit a Presence all on our own, what Hitchens writes doesn’t matter. Here is a man who admits he has no faith, nor capacity for it, but presumes to write volumes on the topic. Meanwhile, holly-sprigged rubes like me welcome Christmas and its admittedly pagan customs because we find in it, amid the carol-singing and present-wrapping and eggnog-swilling, little bursts of joy as inexplicable as a black hole, or a massive wet planet skipping through space.
At church this past Sunday a guy attended who has been investigating for some time, but I think at this point he is developing his own unique brand of faith. As we're leaving he starts asking how we, people who claim to belong to the true church, could celebrate a holiday with pagan origins. I like that my answer would come from the bits and pieces of these various articles offered by people from different faiths.

In spite of differences that we might have in points of doctrine regarding the Godhead/Trinity, Christ's literal resurrection, or any number of other disputed tenets, one thing we can agree upon and celebrate together is the birth of our Savior. It's less about being accurate with the day of observance and more about the universal recognition of the ethereal nature of the miracle we celebrate. In His birth we have the fulfillment of prophecy; in His birth we have the reaffirmation of the vital pillars that support the Plan of Salvation. This time more than any other people are more inclined to act Christlike than at any other point during the entire year. Moreover, it brings faith and charitable living to the forefront of our collective consciousness'. I can't think of one valid reason to not celebrate Christmas that would outweigh all of these tremendous benefits. Not a one.